Click 'Connect with Facebook' to join NetworkedBlogs. NetworkedBlogs is a community of bloggers and blog lovers. Join the fun, add your blog, and connect with others who read and write about subjects you like.
Sunday November 29/09 snippets
- BigCityLib fact checks & reads Mark Steyn’s columns at Macleans so you don’t have to. I wonder if he’ll be doing that with recently arrived Colby Cosh as well. He may not be blogging about much else if he takes that on too.
- An odd way for the Canadian government to show patriotism with the upcoming Vancouver Olympics: “Canada’s $9.2-million, Olympic pavilion is being bui
If Harper can change his mind on things..
…then I can as well… at least partially, anyhow. The thing I’ve changed my mind on (partially) is using Twitter.
I’ve been a rather strong skeptic of Twitter as many of you know. I’ve not seen much use for 140 characters or less,and I’m still not sure I do. However, in talking with one of my Progressive Bloggers affiliates, Matt (who blogs at bastard.logic), he mentioned there was a thing called Twitterfeed, that could retransmit blogposts (or at least, their title and a brief summary) to Twitter.
That I think would be half useful.. so along with s
No excuses for not holding a public inquiry or releasing the unredacted Colvin memos.
Let’s presume for a minute that there are “state secrets” in Richard Colvin’s memos that would harm Canadian national security (a big presumption with this government – anxious to discredit Colvin’s testimony – but like I said, let’s do it for a minute). Is that enough reason to withhold them? James Traver says nope, that’s just an excuse:
Often the last refuge of those tossing restlessly at night, the secrecy obstacle now threatening the public right to know is
Another poll shows overwhelming support for Colvin; majority want public inquiry.
Hat tip to Steve V over at Far and Wide for seeing this poll, taken on November 24/25:
49% find Richard Colvin’s testimony credible; 10% side with federal government ministers.
As Steve said, that’s a ratio of 5-1 of people polled who believe Colvin’s testimony over the government’s official version of “no credible evidence”. That’s even higher then the 2-1 margin from the ini
Questions? contact: networkedblogs@ninua.com
Copyright (C) 2008, Ninua, Inc.